2.28.2007

The Shortest Set Ever



What you see above just might be the shortest set ever... it's a chem set that's just two pages long and only took about an hour and a half! Read the book, find out the IUPAC method of naming hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, and the like, then apply the knowledge on a reasonable problem set! This is a new process to me, but I like it.

I'm finally sort of caught up. It's Wednesday night, and I've been working on homework since Sunday. Well, not since Sunday, but since Sunday. I've taken breaks to eat and sleep on a regular schedule, I've gone to class, I took a break yesterday afternoon to play interhouse volleyball and rode my bike to In 'N' Out later on. But I haven't really done anything other than that... except work. I finished my chemistry quiz on Monday and my physics set the day before it was due, and today I finished my chemistry set that's due Friday. It's a great and rare feeling, not having anything due until Monday. (Except a physics quiz that's due Friday.)

Alright, I'll check in with you later.

/rskjr

2.25.2007

Post-Drop Day

So it's 3:20 AM here. I can't fall asleep, so you, my dear reader, are benefiting. Or not. Well guess what... you get to hear about my day! I woke up at around 2 PM today, made some food and some coffee with my new French press, and started working on studying for my Math 1D final. I took the final at 7 PM (it was a 3 hour test), and somewhere in between there I found a Windows XP SP2 disk and installed Windows on my macbook again. So... an entire day devoted more or less to my Math 1D final. But I learned some other things today... Caltech's unit system for how courses are weighted isn't completely random. It's supposed to mean how much time is spent on classes/homework/lab per week. So let's crack open the Caltech Course Catalog...

This term I'm taking:
        class-lab-homework

Math 1D: 2-0-3
Chem 1B: 4-0-5
Phys 1B: 4-0-5
ChE 10: 2-0-1
PE 70: 3 units
Math 1B: 4-0-5

So I'm supposed to have about 19 hours of classes and about 19 hours of homework per week, for a total of less than 40 hours of "work" per week. Sounds TOTALLY manageable, right? Not for me! My google calendar has 17 hours of class scheduled for me. Hah! Screwed you over, Caltech. Turns out ChE10 only meets once a week for an hour, it's a seminar 'pizza' course. Oh, and PE 70, my weightlifting class, only meets twice a week, not three times. OK, so 17 hours of class/week. (And last week, I went to every single class and recitation session. w00t.) What's the problem then? Well. Take Ma1D for instance... 3 hours of homework/week? Yeah right. Today, I didn't spend enough time studying for the final, I should have spent another entire day to get everything right on the exam. In fact, it wasn't an open book exam, but if I had studied another entire day, and been able to use my book and notes, I still wouldn't have gotten everything... proofs are really difficult for me. "But finals week is an anomaly," you say. Not every week is like finals week, requiring 10+ hours of work. Well, I routinely spent five or six or seven hours on a Ma1D set, and routinely scored less than seventy percent, even after consulting with my TA and collaborating with other students.

How about Ma1B, my linear algebra class? The sets I turn in are around 15 pages each, I have half an inch of graded assignments plus a midterm and an entire 2" D-ring full of lecture notes, handouts, and other stuff. I spend maybe five or six or seven or eight hours a week on this (I'll probably spend all of my productive hours tomorrow on set 7.).

OK, and chemistry? Five hours of class/week, which I usually go to. This week, I screwed Caltech over again, my set only took three or four hours. It was an easy set, organic chemistry stuff, IUPAC names, 3-D structures/isomers/enantiomers/other stuff. So, I only spent four hours instead of five! Oh wait, it's a quiz week. So I'll spend Monday preparing for the quiz that's due Tuesday, and probably get reamed anyways. Oh well, I have a C in there, and it's still pass/fail.

I feel like shouting to every high school in America, "Don't choose Caltech unless you LOVE MATH AND SCIENCE and you either don't care or just plain hate everything else!" But at the same time, I feel doubt about whether or not I want to transfer.

Why is that? It doesn't make sense. My sleep schedule/personal life is fucked, I don't participate in anything school related except classes, and I see no research or interesting academic opportunities in my near future. And I hate all of my classes (except chemistry, which is interesting right now).

I'm getting my ass kicked here, I might be able to succeed next term, but not to the point of having enough free time to do anything fun on a regular basis... I'm lucky the people here are really cool. On the other hand I can understand why some of these brilliant students are driven to alcoholism and substance abuse.

You might be happy to know I didn't spend all of Friday night studying and doing homework and whatnot. Blacker House played Lloyd house in Capture-the-flag, all campus style. Such keep-sane activities are awesome. Both houses grabbed arm bands of different colors and a flag, and set off to their respective sides. It was three hours of running around in the steam tunnels, random buildings, and campus gardens, running reconnaissance missions to plot locations of the enemy jail and flag, getting tagged and taken to jail, and intimidating the other team along the neutral zone. It was pretty sweet, even the ending, when Lloyd house served milk shakes and smoothies back in their dining hall.

In other news, I'm realizing I'm sort of popular. If you search technorati's blog listings for "ricketts caltech", three of my blog posts come out on top. If you're a pre-frosh considering Caltech, here's a little disclaimer: I'm not necessarily representative of Caltech, or Ricketts House. But FUCK Fleming. And Ruddock. And Lloyd. And Avery, but they're not a hovse anyways. I'm going to start spamming my listings with keywords like CALTECH ADMISSIONS and IMPROVE YOUR SAT SCORES so people read about my experience here at Caltech. It's not all bad. But it's mostly bad.

Man, do I love to bitch about school. I never used to be like this! What did I used to do with all of my time??? Let me know if you've seen my sanity. :\ It's 4:13. Time to try sleeping again.

/rskjr

Techers Know How To Party

Just kidding!



These are pics from Dabney Houses's 'Drop Day' party, a sort of psychedelic affair. They did indeed build a gigantic geodesic dome from tin foil or something, and hired a bunch of incredible DJ's. The best part is all the stuff you can play with, like those crazy plasma lamps that freak out when you touch them. The best part, though, was a computer running a visualizer (think iTunes), except you controlled it... There were two mice hooked up, and the user, just by clicking and moving the mouse, created the screen effects. I heard the program was written in one 36 sitting by a Caltech student, and when some other CS majors went in to try to optimize it, they couldn't figure out how it worked and were unable to change anything successfully. In another room, there was a similar device involving a webcam and projector pointed at the same wall, and a box full of buttons and switches you could push to change the image. Fun! Not to mention a giant pit of plastic balls, Chuck E. Cheese style!

/robert

2.23.2007

Credit Union vs. Credit Union: No One Really Wins This Time


So yeah. Here's a picture of me, thinking about my latest gripe with Caltech: its credit union. You might see it in the background, as I am sitting on the Bechtel Mall on the west side of Caltech's tiny campus, right by CEFCU. Credit unions are supposed to be superior to banks, they're not in business for the profit (??), serve a small community rather than a more diverse clientèle that a bank might have, and in general serve their customers better. But my bank doesn't accept currency. You might ask, "But Robert, what then do they do?" And I would say "I have no idea." I went into my bank yesterday (ahem, credit union, excuse me) with a bag chock full o' money, and they refused it. They don't accept American currency! You're either with US, or you're with the terrorists, as our President says. If they're not accepting US coins, what are you doing? Acccepting al-Qaeda coins? Offering aid and comfort to our enemies? We all know what that's punishable by.


/robert

2.21.2007

Title and Registration

Midterms are over, the last day to drop classes today, and registration for classes starts tomorrow. I'll be taking Math 001c, Phys 001c, Astronomy 001 (a 'menu' course I'm excited about) and Biology 001. This adds up to 36 units, which is two less than what I'm taking now and the minimum allowed without an underload petition. Students routinely take 50 to 60 to even 70 units, so I'm going to try to add another 9 unit class, like Spanish or a computer science course.

One problem is, there aren't any computer courses I can take.

That's right... I'm at Caltech, but I can't take a computer course??? The only CS course a freshman can take first term is CS1, Caltech's intro class. Now it's third term, and in order to take any other computer course, I need to have taken CS1. Is it asking too much for me to want my school to offer CS classes throughout the whole year?

I guess I'm lucky I can take a Spanish class.

/robert

2.14.2007

Did Google Forget The "L"?

Or is it the stem of the strawberry?

2.08.2007

The Nobel Prize

Just a few seconds ago I found myself with a group of Caltech Ricketts undergraduates having a discussion with a professor about biology. We were speaking briefly about evolution...


"At any given moment there's a lot of shit going on, and there seems to be very little progress in a specific direction. What most people don't seem to realize is that there is a lot more progress in one direction that is imagined... If you're going to study biology, you need to be interested in weird stories. You study some anomaly, some weird guy in a system, and devote your research to that."

This was after our dress dinner, which happens once a term. We get to dress up, have a four course meal in our dining hall, and invite TA's, professors, or anyone else we would like to come have dinner with us.

So I found myself outside after dinner, wearing a three piece plaid suit right out of the twenties, enjoying some peach flavored hookah tobacco with some other skurves, commenting on another group of people standing around another (apple flavored) hookah.

I probably said something like... "This school is fucking crazy. Over there, there's a bunch of students, everyone's ridiculously dressed up, drinking wine, some puffing on cigars, some passing the hookah around, and that might not seem so strange. But they're talking to some professor, and he's probably some prof that's won the Nobel prize."

It turns out that this professor was none other than David Politzer, Caltech's most recent Nobel laureate. In 1973, as a grad student, he came up with "asymptotic freedom" in collaboration with two other physicists. Asymptotic freedom, as far as I understand, has something to do with how Quarks bind more tightly to each other the farther apart they become.

I was just hypothesizing... and turned out to be right by some strange coincidence. This was the gentleman we were just discussing evolution with, for no apparent reason.


It's just me, reporting from a not-so-untypical day at Caltech.

2.06.2007

Letters Unsent

Hello friends,
I'm stuck here. This is sort of hard.... I just stumbled across a letter I wrote a long time ago to... well..
Stanford.
I haven't edited it at all, except for typographical stuff as I read along. This is some very, very deep stuff. I should have listened to myself. I was so smart a year ago when I wrote this...
Anyways. Here is the letter that Stanford never received that probably wouldn't have removed me from the waiting list any differently than I was removed.
Keep in mind, I wrote this to Stanford, and I probably didn't agree then with what I wrote about Williams College. I certainly don't agree with it now.
This is a long post. I don't expect you to read it, dear reader, let's just say this is another blog entry more to guide me with my decisions than for your enjoyment.



Greetings from South Dakota,
I am writing to you about my placement on the Stanford waiting list. The waitlist information suggests updating my résumé. I assume you would like to hear that the application process for colleges did not exhaust the intellectual curiosity of waitlisted students.
As is probably the case with many high school students who chose to apply to Stanford, I will have some difficult decisions to make before May 1. Right now, there are three schools I am interested in attending. In mid-march I was accepted to Caltech, a great school for engineering, math or science. In late march, I was accepted to Williams College, a great school for a liberal arts education. Despite the options I have, Stanford has been my number one choice since (and before) I visited Stanford for the first time last summer.
Last Thursday, I saw a play put on by Stevens High School, “Cyrano de Bergerac”. One of my best friends, Zack Abrahamson, did a marvelous job portraying the lead. Despite the many minor annoyances that usually accompany plays by our drama department like speakers buzzing (in a show without sound amplification of any kind), an antsy audience, or a curtain not opening and closing properly, the last scene literally brought tears to my eyes. I will admit that I do not know the deeper meaning of literature or art, or even what it may mean in my own life, but I know for a high school performance to evoke a real emotion from a theatre attendee is amazing (to me). I called my friend Zack to congratulate him after the play, and I was invited to Perkins to eat and celebrate with the cast and crew since they had finished their final performance. I accepted, but when I reached the restaurant I saw my friends’ cars, the same cars I had seen daily when I worked with the theatre. I realized I was not truly a part of them. Just then, I felt alienated. Between my other extracurriculars, getting into and preparing for college, and fear of earning bad grades in my three college courses and AP classes, I couldn’t fit “Cyrano” into my schedule. Would I have a chance to be part of a drama production at Caltech, where the science and math workload alone could be prohibitive to adding extra activities to my schedule? Probably, but at the expense of another part of my life, whether it was sleep, grades, or social life.
Today I finished a visit to Williams college. A few things struck me about the lifestyle of the campus, for example a student in my host dorm disappeared one night and mentioned when he came back smoking weed and playing Beirut (beer pong). Was his group of friends a microcosm of Williams? Was it a microcosm of the Little Ivy schools? Was it a microcosm of college life? I don’t know. Apart from my limited experience with the more “exotic” side of Williams, I will let you know that I thoroughly enjoyed my visit to Williamstown.
The major experience of my trip occurred when Thomas Friedman spoke to a packed hall. His talk was a discussion of his latest book, “The World Is Flat”. He talks about Globalization 1.0 (countries going global, 1700s to 1800s), 2.0 (companies going global, 1800s to 2000), and 3.0 (individuals participating in the global market, 2000 to present). Forgive me if you have already read his book. He also discusses 10 major “flatteners”, like the internet, Windows operating system, and outsourcing of jobs to India. Towards the end of the discussion, he made a list of jobs that are not going to be affected by globalization 3.0, like your brain surgeon, and “butchers, bakers, and candlestick makers”, those people who have a specific job to do in a specific place cannot be outsourced to India or China. During his speech he quoted an executive of a technology company in India who said “In the next few years, we know what our job is going to be. Our job is going to be doing your current job. Your role in the future is to create just that…. the world’s future.” Friedman ended his talk by saying “Green is the new red, white, and blue. Green is the most patriotic thing you can be.”
After his speech, a passion sort of became realized in my head. Ever since I read Atlas Shrugged for the first time (I was about 10, I’m sure I didn’t understand a third of what I read) I was fascinated by the concept of harvesting static electricity from the atmosphere. Granted, the concept is metaphorically used in Rand’s novel as a representation of “the next great idea”. I have always been interested in how things work. In particular, after reading Rand’s novels, locomotion, automobiles, energy, infrastructure, really just everything that is today presenting us with a problem because of the upcoming shortage of oil that we will encounter. In short, before today when I was asked about my plans for study in college I would respond with a myriad of different subjects from Spanish to chemistry. Now, I feel that I have an area I am truly interested in for a reason; that area is alternative energy. By coincidence I was randomly assigned the topic of alternative energy for a research project in my AP government class. I have been immersing myself in Wikipedia pages, magazine articles, and books about alternative energy. I want to explore alternative energy in detail as part of my undergraduate education.
Coincidentally, Friday, April 7 was the date of the Chadron Academic competition, where hundreds of students from dozens of high schools in Wyoming, Nebraska, and South Dakota take tests in subjects from health and consumer sciences to advanced mathematics. My friend Alan and I took the economics and American government tests and we both placed in the top three. Granted, this is no national competition, and many of the smartest students from this region of the country were not in attendance. Zack, who will be matriculating at Princeton, Cornell, or Yale this fall couldn’t attend because he was working on the play. While in Chadron I thought about the pros and cons of Williams college. While they do have a neuro-science department as well as good physics and chemistry programs, as many of the so-called “little ivys” do, I am worried that the advanced physics and chemistry programs and facilities like SLAC that interest me at Stanford would be lacking in my education at Williams. (I just recently installed the Folding@Home software on my computer, without realizing it was a Stanford chemistry department program.)
I have not perfected my SAT scores, solved a major scientific or mathematic enigma, or won an international academic competition since I applied in December. I have, however, been reading and pursuing my academic and athletic interests. In particular, finding cleaner and more efficient ways to fuel motor vehicles and to generate electricity now intrigue me after reading the book Beyond Oil by Kenneth Deffeyes. I have been learning the Adobe software Photoshop and Illustrator, and recently created T-shirt designs that were printed on our Ultimate Frisbee team’s “uniforms”.
Stanford is ideal for me. I imagine myself doing undergraduate research in physics or chemistry and playing ultimate Frisbee on weekends. I imagine socializing in Palo Alto with the brightest and most diverse students in the world; and not students who are interested only in the same areas of study that I am. I imagine participating in drama productions put on each semester by doing publicity, audio, or tech work.
I imagine myself in Palo Alto.
I look forward to hearing back from the admissions committee about a place in Stanford’s 2006 freshman class. Thank you for your time.


/robert karl

2.03.2007

This One's (Not) For You


Ok All. The point of this blog entry is not for the reader.

It's for me.

It's midterms week. I'm collecting these eight and a half by five and a half stapled pieces of paper like they're going out of style. Two math midterms and a physics quiz this weekend, a chemistry midterm next.

My math 1b midterm was easy, out of the allotted four hours I only used two or three. I actually understood every problem at first glance, which has very rarely happened for me at best here. The class being on linear algebra, I probably made mistakes, but I'm not worried at all about passing this class.

I'm worried about my second term math class for those who didn't do well enough on the Caltech math placement test to be in regular Math 1a. I was in a special section of Math 1a that went at a slower pace and didn't cover sequences and series. Well, sequences and series came back and bit me.

I thought I understood the material, and did the first set, mostly by myself. It's only a 5 unit class, which means it's worth about half as much (time and credit) as my other classes. Well, I scored a fifty percent on the first set, where a sixty-five is a guaranteed pass. I thought things would improve with the second set, but I scored a fifty-three, which really didn't bring me any closer to passing with a sixty-five.

So here I am studying for the midterm. I showed my mastery of the material twice by getting half of the points. To say the very least I feel totally screwed. Oh well, I can always take it next year, with next year's batch of mentally handicapped (Caltech style) frosh.

Then there is chemistry, which I should pass if I study for. In chemistry there are nine teaching assistants who are extremely helpful grad students who would very much like to see students pass who come for help. Chemistry is hard, but I can get help, I can read about it in a book, and I can talk to people.

I don't know what to do for math when I get to a proof I don't know how to do. It's like hitting a brick wall that's twenty feet high. If I hit the right brick, the wall will swing away and I can complete the problem, but the right brick could be ten feet over my head. I need someone to tell me what brick to hit, or what trick I need to finish the problem, and then I can understand... or still not understand. Whatever. I don't like the math teaching style at this school. Placing students in a small class separated from their peers does not give them an advantage in an environment where survival requires collaboration. Especially in a subject like math.

I guess all in all, things are OK. I'm passing physics, and doing very well in linear algebra. I may not pass Math 1d, but that's OK, too. Chemistry? I should survive.

Sequences it is, homies. And learning electricity and magnetism, which I've never been exposed to. Oh, and figuring out thermochemistry. And equilibrium. I'll check back in with you later, after all that. Hah.


/rskjr